ReadmitRisk Executive Report - MIMIC-IV Dataset

ICU Readmission Risk Analysis | Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (2008-2019)

Data Source: MIMIC-IV Clinical Database (MIT Laboratory for Computational Physiology) | ICU admissions from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (2008-2019). This analysis includes 211,354 ICU admissions with 60+ clinical features including vitals, labs, medications, and procedures. Cost exposure calculated using 2024 industry benchmarks ($15,000 average readmission cost). For demonstration purposes only.

211,354
Total ICU Admissions
114,589
High-Risk Admissions (60%+)
$1.15B - $2.86B
Total Cost Exposure Range
20.5%
30-Day Readmission Rate

Executive Summary

Critical Finding

ICU patients show significantly higher readmission risk than general populations. 54.2% of ICU admissions are classified as high-risk (≥60%) compared to 9.9% in general diabetes populations (UCI dataset). This reflects the complex, acute nature of ICU care and higher baseline severity.

Analysis of 211,354 ICU admissions from the MIMIC-IV Clinical Database reveals:

Population Overview

211,354
Total ICU Admissions
114,589
High-Risk (60%+)
43,328
Readmitted Within 30 Days
63%
Model AUC Score

Risk Tier Distribution

Risk Tier Risk Range Count % of Total Avg Readmission Rate Cost Exposure Range
Critical 80%+ 68,962 32.6% 30.8% $690M - $1.72B
Very High 70-80% 25,978 12.3% 25.2% $260M - $649M
High 60-70% 19,649 9.3% 21.4% $196M - $491M
Moderate/Low <60% 96,765 45.8% 8.9% -

Key Risk Factors

Gradient Boosting feature importance analysis identifies the strongest predictors of 30-day readmission in ICU populations:

Risk Factor Feature Importance Clinical Significance
ICU Length of Stay 18.3% Extended ICU stays indicate severity and complexity
Medication Count 14.2% Polypharmacy increases adverse events and non-adherence
Age 12.7% Elderly patients (70+) show 32.8% avg risk vs 24.1% overall
Vital Sign Variability 11.5% Hemodynamic instability predicts post-discharge complications
Mechanical Ventilation 9.8% Respiratory failure increases readmission risk
Lab Abnormalities 8.4% Metabolic derangements (creatinine, lactate) signal organ dysfunction
Prior ICU Admissions 7.6% History of critical illness indicates chronic complexity
Discharge to Facility 5.9% SNF/rehab discharge correlates with functional decline

Comparison to General Population (UCI Diabetes)

Metric UCI Diabetes
(General Population)
MIMIC-IV
(ICU Population)
Difference
Total Patients 71,518 211,354 +195%
Readmission Rate 8.8% 20.5% +133%
High-Risk % 9.9% 54.2% +447%
Model AUC 73% 63% -14%
Features Available 20 (basic) 60+ (rich clinical) +200%
Data Period 1999-2008 2008-2019 More recent

Recommended Actions

1. Intensive Transitional Care for Critical Tier (68,962 patients)

  • ICU-to-home transitional care programs with ICU-trained case managers
  • Post-ICU syndrome screening and management (PICS)
  • Home health visits within 48 hours with respiratory therapy assessment
  • 24/7 nurse hotline for post-ICU patients

2. Medication Management for Polypharmacy (avg 25+ medications)

  • Critical care pharmacist medication reconciliation within 72 hours
  • Deprescribing protocols for ICU survivors
  • Automated pill dispensers for complex regimens
  • Virtual medication coaching

3. Respiratory Monitoring for Vent Patients

  • Pulmonology follow-up within 7 days for mechanically ventilated patients
  • Home pulse oximetry monitoring programs
  • COPD/asthma action plans with clear escalation pathways

4. Geriatric Care Pathways for 70+ Patients

  • Comprehensive geriatric assessment at discharge
  • Delirium screening and cognitive monitoring
  • Fall prevention and mobility optimization
  • Caregiver education and support

Cost-Benefit Analysis

Based on intervention effectiveness literature and MIMIC-IV risk stratification:

Intervention Program Target Population Cost Per Patient Expected Reduction ROI Estimate
ICU Transitional Care Critical tier (69K) $850 25-35% 350-450%
Clinical Pharmacist Visits High polypharmacy (60K) $350 15-25% 200-300%
Home Health (48hr) Very high tier (26K) $600 20-30% 250-400%
Post-ICU Clinic All ICU survivors (211K) $200 10-15% 150-200%

Model Performance Metrics

Classification Performance

ROC-AUC 0.63
Sensitivity (Recall) 70%
Specificity 58%
Positive Predictive Value 28%
Negative Predictive Value 89%

Model Details

Algorithm Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)
Features 61 clinical variables
Training Data 169,083 admissions (80%)
Test Data 42,271 admissions (20%)
Class Balancing SMOTE

Data Quality & Limitations

Next Steps

  1. Pilot Program: Implement ICU transitional care for critical-risk tier (top 20%) and measure 30-day readmission reduction
  2. External Validation: Test model performance on local ICU population to assess generalizability
  3. Real-Time Integration: Integrate risk scoring into EHR discharge workflow for automated patient identification
  4. Intervention Tracking: Build dashboard to monitor intervention uptake and outcomes by risk tier
  5. Cost Tracking: Link readmission events to actual hospital costs for precise ROI measurement