Comprehensive analysis across MIMIC-IV ICU, UCI Diabetes, and National Geographic datasets
π Platform Overview: This report synthesizes insights from three complementary datasets: MIMIC-IV ICU clinical data (211K admissions, 2008-2019), UCI Diabetes multi-hospital data (71K patients, 1999-2008), and CMS Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program geographic data (205 hospitals, 5 states). Together, these provide comprehensive readmission risk intelligence across care settings and geographies.
The ReadmitRisk platform provides multi-dimensional readmission risk intelligence by integrating three distinct data sources:
This combined approach enables healthcare organizations to: (a) identify high-risk patients using validated ML models, (b) benchmark provider performance against national standards, and (c) prioritize interventions based on evidence-based ROI projections.
ICU populations show 5.5Γ higher high-risk prevalence (54.2%) compared to general diabetes populations (9.9%). Organizations must deploy differentiated care management strategies: intensive transitional care for ICU survivors vs. medication management and outpatient coordination for general medical/surgical patients.
| Metric | MIMIC-IV (ICU) |
UCI Diabetes (General Pop) |
CMS Geographic (National) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sample Size | 211,354 admissions | 71,518 patients | 205 hospitals |
| Readmission Rate | 20.5% | 8.8% | 15.5% (avg across 5 states) |
| High-Risk % | 54.2% (β₯60%) | 9.9% (β₯60%) | N/A |
| Model AUC | 0.630 (Gradient Boosting) | 0.564 (Logistic Regression) | N/A |
| Features | 60+ clinical variables | 12 administrative variables | State/hospital aggregates |
| Time Period | 2008-2019 | 1999-2008 | Current (2023) |
| Cost Exposure | $1.92B (high-risk cohort) | $78.5M (high-risk cohort) | $21M penalties (5 states) |
π₯ Best for: Post-ICU transitional care programs, critical illness survivors, mechanically ventilated patients
π Best for: General medical/surgical populations, diabetes-specific programs, multi-hospital systems
πΊοΈ Best for: Provider network optimization, value-based contracting, regional quality improvement
| Patient Segment | Risk Level | Primary Dataset | Intervention Strategy | Expected Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICU Survivors | Critical (80%+) | MIMIC-IV | ICU transitional care + home health | 25-35% |
| Complex Chronic | Very High (70-80%) | UCI + MIMIC | Case management + pharmacist | 20-30% |
| Diabetes/Multi-morbid | High (60-70%) | UCI Diabetes | Nurse calls + outpatient coordination | 15-25% |
| High-Penalty Hospitals | Regional Focus | CMS Geographic | Quality collaboratives + SDOH screening | 10-20% |
Based on intervention effectiveness literature and platform risk stratification:
| Intervention | Cost/Patient | Patients Targeted | Readmissions Prevented | Savings | Net ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICU Transitional Care | $850 | 68,962 | 4,827 (28% of expected) | $72.4M | $13.8M (24% ROI) |
| Intervention | Cost/Patient | Patients Targeted | Readmissions Prevented | Savings | Net ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transitional Care Mgmt | $300 | 7,083 | 425 (20% reduction) | $6.4M | $4.3M (200% ROI) |
ICU and general populations require fundamentally different transitional care approaches. Allocate highest-intensity resources (home health, pharmacists, case managers) to ICU survivors; leverage lower-cost nurse calls and outpatient coordination for general medical/surgical patients.
Use CMS geographic data to prioritize quality improvement partnerships with hospitals showing high penalty rates. These facilities offer greatest opportunity for penalty reduction and collaborative gain.
Embed risk scoring into discharge workflow to enable proactive intervention deployment rather than retrospective case-finding. Target <72 hour activation for all high-risk patients.
Establish baseline readmission rates by risk tier, then track quarterly performance. Use local outcomes data to retrain models and adjust intervention intensity to optimize ROI.
ICU population risk analysis with 211K admissions
General population diabetes risk analysis
CMS hospital penalty and regional benchmarks
Data extraction and feature engineering details
Model training and validation approach
CMS data processing and analysis methods